Legal Opinion
Sound Ship Building Corp. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 8, 1975No. Civ. A. 112-73PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOLAHAN, District Judge.
This áction and the presently pending motion for summary judgment by defendant Bethlehem Steel Corporation and the cross-motion for partial summary judgment as to liability by plaintiff Sound Ship Building Corporation concern the issue of the validity, under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, of a covenant between buyer and seller restricting for a 20-year period the uses to which real property can be put. Plaintiff argues that the covenant violates the Sherman Act whether tested by the per se or “reasonableness” standard of illegality. The Court disagrees.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- King v. PA Consulting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Newport Terminals, Inc. v. Sunset Terminals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Blackburn v. SweeneyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.