Legal Opinion
Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 12, 1983No. 81-4592Published
1Opinion of the Court
718 F.2d 897
1983-2 Trade Cases 65,492
AYDIN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LORAL CORPORATION, a New York corporation, and Conic
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 81-4592.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Sept. 16, 1982.
Decided July 12, 1983.
Michael L. Harrison, Harrison, Hearn & Berthold, San Jose, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Ernest Leff, Hahn, Cazier & Leff, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Before WALLACE,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.