Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Van Wagoner

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 2, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

197 N.J. Super. 523 (1984)

485 A.2d 341

ALEX ORTIZ, A MINOR BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, HECTOR M. ORTIZ, AND HECTOR M. ORTIZ, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

JOHN VAN WAGONER AND MARILYN F. VAN WAGONER, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Morris County.

Decided August 2, 1984.

James J. Mahoney for plaintiffs (Blume, Vazquez, Goldfaden, Kuhn & Berkowitz, attorneys).

Brian R. O'Toole for defendants (O'Donnell, McCord, Leslie & O'Toole, attorneys.)

MacKENZIE, J.S.C.

The New Jersey Court Rules governing civil procedure authorize a party to propound interrogatories as part of pretrial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fosgate v. CoronaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Gunter v. Fischer Scientific AmericanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  3. Tisdale v. FieldsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Dietzeman v. PetersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Sallo v. SabatinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Serrano v. LevitskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  2. Mehalick v. SchwartzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API