Mehalick v. Schwartz

BARISONEK, J.S.C.

Plaintiffs alleged medical malpractice on the part of defendant doctor concerning the implant of a semirigid penile prosthe*262sis. Plaintiffs also claimed that defendant manufacturer of the prosthesis negligently designed said device. Experts’ reports were furnished to both defendants by plaintiffs through answers to interrogatories propounded under R. 4:10-2(d)(1). One report was a report from a professional engineer as to an alleged defect in the prosthesis. A discovery deposition of plaintiff’s engineer was taken pursuant to R. 4:10-2(d)(2) as opposed to a de bene esse…