Fuhrman v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Dion Fuhrman appealed from an order affirming the Workers Compensation Bureau’s suspension of Fuhrman’s disability and rehabilitation benefits for his failure to comply with a rehabilitation training plan. We hold the Bureau’s conclusion that financial inability cann'ot constitute good cause for noncompliance with a rehabilitation plan is not in accordance with the law. We further hold the Bureau’s finding Fuhrman did not demonstrate financial inability to comply with the Bureau’s rehabilitation plan is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We reverse and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Blanchard v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Held v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Esselman v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lawrence v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Flink v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Cridland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Bjerklie v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Hoffman v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.