Legal Opinion
United States v. Sato
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 4, 1989No. 88 C 6487PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROVNER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought by the federal government to reduce tax assessments to
judgment. The case is currently before the Court on defendants’ motions to dismiss.
Defendants originally delivered their motions to the Court on August 12, 1988. On September 16, 1988, the Court noted that defendants had not set a date for presentment of their motions before the Court. The Court also noted that each motion was accompanied by a notice of filing which stated:
Said Motion is not filed for hearing before any judge under the jurisdiction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- John William Brown v. Gerald Frey, Larry Trickey, Ron Kennedy, John Bain, J. Shanklin, Walter Fisher, Christie Lynch and Bernice TrickeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sato v. PlunkettDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994