Legal Opinion

United States v. Norman Breedlove

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 30, 2014No. 13-3406PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

The case before us raises the question whether a presentence detainee may be involuntarily medicated in order to restore competency for sentencing. In Sell v. United States the Supreme Court determined the framework for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to a detainee in order to make him competent to stand trial. 539 U.S. 166, 123 S.Ct. 2174, 156 L.Ed.2d 197 (2003). Because the district court made adequate findings as to each of the four Sell factors prior to approving the involuntary medication of Appellant Norman Breedlove, we now affirm. Breedlove…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. United States v. Jaime Ochoa BaldovinosCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Herbert G. Evans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Hernandez-VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. United States v. DearCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. Darlene FiesteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  4. Hopkins v. 21st Mortgage CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2024
  5. In re: Marselleen Lynne HopkinsDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API