Mann v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Case Summary and Issues
Following a jury trial, Christopher Mann appeals his conviction and sentence for aggravated battery, a Class B felony. On appeal, Mann raises two issues, which we restate as 1) whether sufficient evidence supports Mann’s conviction and 2) whether Mann’s sentence violates the Proportionality Clause of Article I, Section 16, of the Indiana Constitution. Concluding that sufficient evidence supports Mann’s conviction and that his sentence does not violate the Proportionality Clause, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
On the evening of August 1, 2005,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McHenry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. Moss-DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Tobar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Thompson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Charles Douglas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Cory Lowden v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Scott Grundy v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Matthews v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.