Legal Opinion

Mann v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 2008No. 71A03-0708-CR-355PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issues

Following a jury trial, Christopher Mann appeals his conviction and sentence for aggravated battery, a Class B felony. On appeal, Mann raises two issues, which we restate as 1) whether sufficient evidence supports Mann’s conviction and 2) whether Mann’s sentence violates the Proportionality Clause of Article I, Section 16, of the Indiana Constitution. Concluding that sufficient evidence supports Mann’s conviction and that his sentence does not violate the Proportionality Clause, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On the evening of August 1, 2005,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McHenry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. Moss-DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Tobar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Charles Douglas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. Cory Lowden v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Scott Grundy v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Matthews v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API