Scott Grundy v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
Statement of the Case
[1] Scott Grundy appeals his conviction for Aggravated Battery, a Class B felony, and his habitual offender adjudication. Grundy presents three issues for our review, which we revise and restate as:.
1. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
2. Whether his sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and his character.'
3. Whether the trial court erred when it enhanced his sentence under the prior version of the habitual offender statute.
[2] We affirm Grundy’s conviction and his sentence, and we hold that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Rutherford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Moss-DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Tobar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matthew L. Johnson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Alexander v. WardenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
- Andrew W. Barrus v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jordan L. Langston v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Michael T. Hackworth v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.