Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Totten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

In the statement of case on appeal, the parties have styled the present proceeding “a civil action in the nature of a summary proceeding in ejectment.” It was commenced in a court of a justice of the peace, and heard de novo on appeal to the Superior Court of Durham County.

It is the position of the plaintiffs that the defendant is estopped by the terms of his own deed of trust to deny the tenancy now existing between the Prudential Insurance Company of America as landlord and the defendant and his wife as tenants. Gaylord v. Gaylord, 150 N. C., 222, 63 S. E., 1028.

The defendant, on the other…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gaylord v. GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Gaylord v. . GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Abbott and Foster v. . CromartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. Hamilton v. . HighlandsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Wm. McCombs v. . Albert WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Springs v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. McNinch v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Simons v. . LebrunSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Springs v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Howell v. . BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API