Meghani v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ATLAS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in this gasoline dealer franchise dispute is the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Petroleum Marketing Practices Act Claim (“Defendants’ Motion”) [Doc. # 10]. 1 Plaintiffs are former and current owners of Shell gas station franchises. 2 Plaintiffs have responded in opposition. 3 The Court has considered all matters of record and the applicable authorities, and concludes that Defendants’ Motion should be granted. 4
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In mid-1999, Plaintiffs owned and operated twenty-nine Shell-brand gasoline…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abrams Shell v. Shell Oil CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- PDV Midwest Refining, L.L.C. v. Armada Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Shell v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- Pdv Midwest Refining, L.L.C. v. Armada Oil And Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Mendoza v. Doyle International Louisiana, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021