Legal Opinion

Reiniger v. Besley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1914No. Civil No. 1350PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pima. W. C. Cooper, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Suit by appellant on a note for $300, and interest, and for moneys loaned and money had and received. Answer admitted execution of note, and alleged that, at the time of its delivery, the appellant was negotiating with ap*163pellee the purchase of some mines, and that the $300 evidenced by note was an advancement on the purchase price of .mines, providing the sale was effected, in which event the note was to be canceled and considered as fully paid and discharged. It is alleged that sale was consummated. Answer denies that appellant ever loaned appellee any moneys, and denies that appellee ever…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arizona Cotton Ginning Co. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Callaghan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  3. MacNeill v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Norton v. Tucson Cattle Loan Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API