Legal Opinion

Horace Worth Holland v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 21, 1957No. 16163PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

For the purpose of the decision it is unnecessary to set forth the facts in the case. Only two assignments of error require discussion:

First, the indictment, sufficiently alleging an offense in the language of the statute and putting the defendant on notice, Lynch v. United States, 5 Cir., 189 F.2d 476, certiorari denied 342 U. S. 831, 72 S.Ct. 50, 96 L.Ed. 629; Hermansen v. United States, 5 Cir., 228 F. 2d 495, certiorari denied 351 U.S. 924, 76 S.Ct. 781, 100 L.Ed. 1455; Kreuter v. United States, 5 Cir., 218 F.2d 532, certiorari denied, 349 U.S. 932, 75 S.Ct. 777, 99 L.Ed. 1262, that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Edgington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Villaroman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. LangerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ReyesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. United States v. Thomas M. HaasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Vernon J. FontenotCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Sam De Stefano and Edward SpeiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Samuel C. CashioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API