Legal Opinion

GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Burch

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1996No. A96A1223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

In this declaratory judgment action concerning an automobile liability policy exclusion, the trial court found Georgia Farm Bureau was required to provide on behalf of Mr. Burch up to $25,000 in coverage for injuries to Tammy Robertson. Farm Bureau claims its policy requires it to provide only $15,000 in coverage. We agree and reverse.

Decided September 13, 1996. Fain, Major & Wiley, Charles A. Wiley, Jr., Kim M. Jackson, for appellant. Garland & Milam, Richard G. Milam, Smith, Welch & Studdard, E. Gilmore Maxwell, Hawkins & Parnell, William H. Major III, Robert D. Brooks,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stepho v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Spivey v. Safeway InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ballard Ex Rel. BallardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Krause v. KrauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Wilder v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Wilder v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API