In Re Complaint Against Broome
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
A hearing was held by the Judicial Qualifications Commission to determine whether or not Judge Robert K. Broome of DeKalb Superior Court had:(1) Presided and made rulings in cases in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned due to the fact that his son-in-law represented one of the parties therein; and(2) Entered an order in the case of Wolf v. Wolf revoking an order of Presiding Judge R. Keegan Federal setting a hearing before the non-jury division and in so doing used derogatory language toward Judge Federal from the bench and later on said date went to Judge Federal’s office…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re PauleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re BarrTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.