Legal Opinion
In Re Barr
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1999No. 67PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · BarajasChief Justice Richard Barajas
Chief Justices CORNELIUS, RAMEY and DAVIS, and Justice STOVER, join.1
This action results from the recommendation by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct that Respondent, James L. “Jim” Barr, be removed as Judge of the 337th Judicial District Court of the State of Texas, and further, that he be prohibit*531ed from holding judicial office in the future.2 Judge Barr has rejected the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Commission, and in response, challenges the findings and ultimate recommendation that he be removed from office. We affirm the Commission’s findings in part,…
3Cases cited50 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Ragsdale v. Progressive Voters LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Dreyer Ex Rel. A.D.D. v. GreeneTexas Supreme Court · 1994
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by58 opinions
- in the Interest of L.M.I. and J.A.I., Minor ChildrenTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Abdygapparova v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- Texas, the State Of v. Thirty Thousand Six Hundred Dollars and No/100 ($30,660.00) in U.S. Currency, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Sturgeon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against TurcoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.