Legal Opinion

Wilkie v. Weller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1923No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Clinton; Moinet (Edward J.), J. Assumpsit by Robert Wilkie against Charles E. Weller for the purchase price of an interest in' a beet sugar contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This action is brought to recover the balance of the purchase price of plaintiff’s rights to extra compensation in a contract which he had with the Owosso Sugar Company. On March 3, 1920, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the Owosso Sugar Company by the terms of which he was to grow beets and deliver them to the company for which he was to be paid $10 per ton and an additional compensation per ton depending on the price of sugar. That *666part of the contract relating to the additional compensation is as follows:

“If the average price of beet sugar exceeds $9 per hundred pounds, then the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gregory v. WendellMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. First National Bank v. CarrollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Hazelett v. UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Donovan v. DaiberMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charles L. Bowman & Company, a Michigan Corporation v. C. Ward ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Baldwin, State Treasurer v. RobyWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  3. National Recovery System v. KasleDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  4. Garvin v. HudsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Charles L. Bowman & Company, a Michigan Corporation v. C. Ward ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API