Legal Opinion
Charles L. Bowman & Company, a Michigan Corporation v. C. Ward Erwin
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 6, 1972No. 71-3403PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
Charles Bowman and Company (Bowman and Company) instituted this diversity suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida to recover from C. Ward Erwin approximately $21,000 due under a promissory note executed by Erwin and held by Bowman and Company. Erwin counterclaimed that Bowman and Company had wrongfully received about $72,000 in royalty checks, made payable to Bowman Feed Products (Bowman Feed) and endorsed by Bowman and Company. Erwin stipulated his liability on the note, *1295the case was tried on the counterclaim, and at the close of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Brown v. CaseSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Jean N. Ammons v. The Franklin Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. EnrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Dxs, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, F/k/a Flint X-Ray, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Boat Town USA v. MERCURY MARINE DIVDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Donald E. Carlson v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Hammett v. American Bankers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.