Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Twin Bell Oil Syndicate

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 3, 1934No. 170PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

Under the Revenue Act of 1926 the taxpayer is entitled, in the case of oil and gas wells, to deduct from gross income an allowance for depletion. The relevant sections of the Act are copied in the margin. The present litigation calls for decision as to the total allowance permitted and its apportionment between lessor and lessee where the income is derived from operation under an oil and gas lease.

During 1925, 1926 and 1927 the respondent, as assignee of the lessee named in an oil and gas lease, extracted substantial quantities of oil. By the terms of the lease and the assignment it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. Dakota-Montana Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Burton-Sutton Oil Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Anderson v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Thomas v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Commissioner v. EngleSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API