Legal Opinion
Loudenslager v. Woodbury Heights Land Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 19, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in Woodbury Heights Land Co. v. Loudenslager, 10 Dick. Ch. Rep. 78.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garrison, J.
For an extended statement of the facts of this case I refer to the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney. 10 Dick. Ch. Rep. 78.
I quite agree with the learned vice-chancellor that the case made by the bill was in nowise sustained by the proofs. The *557case made by the bill was that Henry C. Loudenslager, the sole defendant,
“conceived the idea and concocted the plan, for his own benefit and advantage, of acquiring an option or right to purchase a large tract of land near Woodbury in [Gloucester] county, and forming a company among his friends and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Dale v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Allenhurst Park Estates v. SmithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Hollander v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- In Re Accounting of Executors of KoretzkySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Marblehead Bank Co. v. RaridonOhio Court of Appeals · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.