Perkins v. Bergland
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
COPPLE, District Judge.
These actions raise the issue whether the Secretary of Agriculture’s decision to reduce the authorized utilization of national forest lands under a grazing permit is “agency action [which] is committed to agency discretion by law.” 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(2). Plaintiffs Tom and David Perkins are third generation members of a family which has been in the cattle business in Yavapai County, Arizona, since the turn of the century. Prior to August 2, 1973, David Perkins was authorized to graze 158 head of cattle on lands allotted from the Prescott National…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ness Investment Corporation, and Canyon Lake Resort, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and Fred Wirth, ForestsupervisorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Ray Strickland and Sam Lorimer v. Hon. Rogers C. B. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Osborne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Arizona Power Pooling Ass'n v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.