Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Ackerman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 9, 1945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff asks for a reargument of a motion made by him, and denied, to vacate a notice to take the deposition of Julius Roth, an Enforcement Attorney, associated with the attorney for the plaintiff, in the New York Metropolitan operating office of the Office of Price Administration, and also to vacate a subpoena duces tecum served upon Mr. Roth.

The motion originally was based upon the affidavit of Mr. Roth, which stated, in substance, that he was such Enforcement Attorney, that he had no knowledge of the facts that could properly be adduced in evidence, and that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. United States v. AndolschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Ex Parte SackettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. United States v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
  5. Stegall v. ThurmanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  3. Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  4. Bank Line v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  5. Republic of China v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API