Legal Opinion

Renfro v. Interstate Brands Corp.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 24, 1995No. 94-4003-RDRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROGERS, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff alleges that her termination from employment with defendant Interstate Brands Corporation (“Interstate”) breached the terms of its collective bargaining agreement with defendant Local 218 of the Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers International Union (“Local 218”). Plaintiff further alleges that the defendant union breached its duty of fair representation by failing to bring a grievance concerning plaintiffs termination. Thus, plaintiffs claim may be properly characterized as a hybrid § 301/duty of fair representation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pegump v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API