Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 15, 1976No. 72 Civ. 1544 (CHT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
In this action by plaintiff Randolph Phillips (“Phillips”) to recover the “reasonable value” of his services as successful attorney pro se in an earlier suit, a number of motions are currently pending. Defendant Investors Diversified Services, Inc. (“IDS”) has moved for a dismissal of the amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment under Rule 56. Plaintiff has moved under Rule 11 for an order striking the answer to the amended complaint as a “sham” and “false.” 1 In…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vinci v. CeraoloOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Waters v. CafesjianDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Morgan v. North Coast Cable Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990