Legal Opinion
Hadix v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 20, 1998No. Nos. 96-1851, 96-1943, 96-1907 and 96-1908PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Martin, C. J.,
NORRIS, J. (pp. 950-952), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
We are called upon in this appeal to perform the delicate task of determining whether Congress unconstitutionally encroached into matters reserved for the Judiciary in enacting the automatic stay provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA” or “Act”), Pub.L. No. 104-134,110 Stat. 1321-66 (1996), as amended by the Department of the Judiciary Appropriations Act of 1998, Pub.L. No. 105-119, § 123, 111 Stat. 2440, 2470 (1997). 18 U.S.C. § 3626(e) (as amended in…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Martin v. HadixSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Kerr Ex Rel. Kerr v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Inland Bulk Transfer Co. v. Cummins Engine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.