Wright v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
The defendant appeals, pro se, his conviction for the offense of burglary. He has failed to file an enumeration of errors. Held:
Defendant was indicted, entered pleas of guilty to, and convicted of the offenses of burglary and aggravated assault. He appeals only his conviction for burglary. We have thoroughly examined the record and transcript and find no harmful error.
The evidence clearly establishes his guilt of both offenses and that his pleas of guilty were entered intelligently, knowingly, and voluntarily, in accordance with the criteria of Boykin v. Alabama, 395…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Purvis v. ConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Browning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.