Legal Opinion
Browning v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 12, 1979No. 57945, 57946PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Underwood, Judge.
In these two appeals from convictions of violations of the Controlled Substances Act, Code Ann. Ch. 79A-8, defendant Browning, appearing pro se, contends that the court erred in accepting his pleas of guilty tendered in plea bargains without an affirmative showing that they were intelligently and voluntarily made as required by Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 (89 SC 1709, 23 LE2d 274) (1969) and similar cases, and that he entered into these plea bargains because of duress on the part of his attorney.
These contentions are utterly without support in the records and are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Waye v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Barksdale v. RickettsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crump v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Hogue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.