Legal Opinion

Richards v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1941No. L. A. 18023PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIS, J. —

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit in behalf of defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence said defendant moved for a nonsuit, which was granted, followed by the present judgment.

On March 17, 1937, the daughter of plaintiff, while riding as a guest in an automobile, was injured in a collision between the automobile in which she was riding and an' automobile driven and owned by the defendant Charles Lehman. The injuries received resulted in the death of plaintiff’s daughter. This action was instituted to recover…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Robinson v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ducey v. Argo Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Huntsinger v. Glass Containers Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Gipson v. Davis Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API