Legal Opinion

Casco Township v. State Boundary Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 2001No. Docket 217621PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Petitioners appeal by leave granted a circuit court order affirming a decision of the State Boundary Commission (the commission). We affirm.

I. ISSUES

This case presents two issues of first impression. The first is whether the commission had the jurisdiction and authority to determine the legal validity of an agreement entered into pursuant to the provisions of 1984 PA 425, MCL 124.21 et seq.-, MSA 5.4087(21) et seq. (Act 425 agreement). The second is whether competent, material, and substantial evidence supported the commission’s determination that the Act 425 agreements were merely a pretext…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Judges of the 74th Judicial District v. Bay CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Campbell v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Midland Township v. State Boundary CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Township of Owosso v. City of OwossoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Rudolph Steiner School v. Ann Arbor Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Casco Township v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Sylvan Township v. City of ChelseaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Casco Township v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Clam Lake Township v. Department of Licensing & Regulatory AffairsMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Clam Lake Township v. Department of Licensing & Regulatory AffairsMichigan Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API