Legal Opinion
Young v. West Edmond Hunton Lime Unit
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 30, 1954No. 35316Published
1Opinion of the Court
275 P.2d 304 (1954)
J.M. YOUNG and Kate Young, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
WEST EDMOND HUNTON LIME UNIT, a body politic and corporate, Defendant in Error.
No. 35316.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
June 15, 1954.
Rehearing Denied September 28, 1954.
Application for Leave to File Second Petition for Rehearing Denied October 19, 1954.
Dissenting Opinion October 30, 1954.
John Barry, La Jolla, Cal., Wayne W. Bayless, Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.
Robinson, Shipp, Robertson & Barnes, Oklahoma City, and George Hazlett, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant in error.
WELCH, Justice.
The facts are not in dispute.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Young v. West Edmond Hunton Lime UnitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.