Legal Opinion
Young v. West Edmond Hunton Lime Unit
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 30, 1954No. 35316PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Justice.
The facts are not in dispute.
The plaintiffs owned the mineral interest and rights in a certain one-half section and a one-quarter section of .land^,(total 480 acres). The mineral interests in these lands, in respective separate tracts, wer^leased to Sohio Petroleum Company, Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, and Peppers Refining Companyi-The said lands became productive of oil and gas, and adjoining lands also became productive of oil and gas. £\The whole area.of proven productivity (several thousand acres) thereafter became designated as the West Edmond Hunton Lime Field, and was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Bruun v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
3Cited by46 opinions
- Finley v. Marathon Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Coosewoon v. Meridian Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Teel v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Hall Jones Oil Corporation v. ClaroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Howell v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.