Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baldzicki v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 2000No. 00-1647PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

Relators request a writ of prohibition to prevent the submission of Ordinance No. 2000-68 to the Westlake electors at the November 7, 2000 election. In order to be entitled to a writ of prohibition, relators must establish that (1) the board is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) the exercise of that power is unauthorized by law, and (3) denial of the writ will cause injury for which no other adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law exists. State ex rel. Henry v. McMonagle (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 543, 544, 721 N.E.2d 1051, 1052.

Therefore, in order for the writ to issue,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thurn v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Christy v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State ex rel. White v. Kilbane KochOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dohme v. Eurand America, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State ex rel. White v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Phillips v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Tatman v. Fairfield County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2004

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API