Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Long

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1938No. 33170PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, J.

At the August, 193-7, meeting of. the board of supervisors of Tishomingo county, a petition purporting to contain the names of more than 20 per cent, of the qualified electors of the county was presented to the board, asking that an election be called and held to determine whether or not the transportation, storage, sale, distribution, etc., of wine and beer, as provided for by chapter 171, Laws 1934, should be excluded and prohibited in that county. At this meeting an order was passed adjudicating- that the petition contained more than 20 per cent, of the qualified electors of the county;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crittenden v. Town of BoonevilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Power v. RatliffMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Gibbs v. McIntoshMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Board of Sup'rs v. MeltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Barnes v. McLeodMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gill v. Dept. of Wildlife ConservationMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mississippi Emp. SEC. Com'n v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Board of Supervisors v. Mississippi State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  4. MAYOR, ETC., CITY OF PONTOTOC v. WhiteMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Viator v. StoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API