Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 2017No. 2016-CA-53PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTucker, J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Larry Brown appeals from his conviction and sentence for felonious assault and tampering with evidence. Brown contends that the State did not present evidence sufficient to sustain the convictions and that the convictions are against the manifest weight of the evidence. Brown also asserts that the State did not establish venue regarding the felonious assault charge. He further contends that he was denied a fair trial because the State failed to investigate and preserve exculpatory evidence, the prosecutor acted improperly during trial, and counsel was ineffective.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. State v. DorseyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State v. WorthenOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. McDanielOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. SullensOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API