Legal Opinion

Summit Hill School Directors Removal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 7, 1927No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Three directors of the School District of Summit Hill Borough, Carbon County, have appealed from a decree of the court of common pleas in proceedings under section 217 of the School Code of 1911, P. L. 309, removing them from office and appointing others to fill their unexpired terms. The act referred to provides that if the court shall be of opinion that the directors have failed or neglected to perform any required duty it “shall have the power to remove said board or such of its members as in its opinion is proper, and appoint for the unexpired terms other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hibbs v. ArensbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Summit Hill School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. New Castle CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Pearlman v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. McLaughlin v. Lansford Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Davis's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Schuck v. School Dist. of Baldwin Twp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API