Legal Opinion
Schuck v. School Dist. of Baldwin Twp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 21, 1929No. Appeals, 69 and 70PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
In response to an advertisement, seven bids were received for the construction of a public school. The four lowest were: Dick Construction Company, $34,740; S. A. Hamel & Son, $36,659; Frank L. Cadule, $36,740 and A. C. Slencamp, $36,990. By a vote of three to two the board of school directors awarded the contract to the highest of these four bidders, whereupon the present taxpayer’s bill was filed, which resulted in a decree perpetually enjoining the school directors and Slencamp “from putting into effect the contract” for the construe tion of the building. From…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hibbs v. ArensbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Harris v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Williams v. Finlaw, Mueller & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Summit Hill School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kratz v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Pearlman v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Lutz Appellate Printers, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- McLaughlin v. Lansford Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Yoder v. Luzerne Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.