Legal Opinion

Mazza v. Agency of Transportation

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 19, 1998No. 97-130PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

The State of Vermont appeals from a Chittenden Superior Court condemnation award in favor of Samuel Mazza arguing that the amount awarded for business loss was improper because the business was incorporated and, therefore, was not owned by the landowner. The landowner has cross-appealed claiming: (1) the amount awarded for the land was inadequate as a matter of law; (2) the amount awarded for business loss was also inadequate as a matter of law; and (3) the jury should have awarded additional damages for relocation of an irrigation line. We affirm.

The land in question, approximately 7.3…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Green Mountain Marble Co. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  2. Demers v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  3. In Re Appeal of LundeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. Record v. Vermont Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
  5. City of Winooski v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Chittenden Solid Waste Dist.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. City of Blue Mound, Texas v. Southwest Water Company and Monarch Utilities I, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  3. In re Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API