Legal Opinion

In Re Appeal of Lunde

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 10, 1997No. 95-589PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Developer Feeteau Construction, Inc. appeals from two orders of the environmental court, which denied permits to place two mobile homes, one on each of two adjoining lots in a planned residential zone in the City of Barre. Developer argues that Barre City zoning regulation § 5.14.03(a)(4), prohibiting mobile homes in planned residential zones unless in mobile home parks, violates 24 *168V.S.A. § 4406(4)(A), which it claims requires mobile homes to be treated upon the same terms and conditions as conventional housing. Neighbor Alfred W. Lunde maintains that the court correctly denied the permit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Sabia v. NevilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  3. State v. BeattieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Houston v. Town of WaitsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re Atwood Planned Unit Development (Kevin Trout, Dorothy Wilson, Graham McAfee, Linda McAfee, Steven Wyatt, Donna Wyatt, Jeff Marshall, Jack Manning, Suba Luck, Brian Stevens and Catherine Stevens, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  2. In re Beliveau NOV, Town of Fairfax v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Merkel v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. Roy v. Woodstock Community Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Agency of Natural Resources v. DesoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API