Legal Opinion

Beesley v. Landmark Realty, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 25, 1983PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIOLETTE, Justice.

Defendant Landmark Realty, Inc. (Landmark) appeals from a Superior Court, Cumberland County, denial of its motion to dissolve an ex parte attachment against it in the amount of $75,770.77. Landmark’s primary contentions on appeal are that the motion justice erred in finding that plaintiffs had established a danger that Landmark would remove its assets from the court’s jurisdiction and in finding a reasonable likelihood that plaintiffs would succeed in their case on the merits. We deny the appeal.

Plaintiffs initially brought an action against several defendants, including…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northeast Investment Co. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Bowman v. DussaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Barrett v. StewartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Maine National Bank v. AnderschatSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. Ingalls v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DiPietro v. Casco Northern BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. Trans Coastal Corp. v. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Brickyard Associates v. Auburn Venture PartnersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. Xaphes v. MowrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. Casco Northern Bank, N.A. v. New England Sales, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API