Salazar v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is a motion for class certification filed by plaintiffs Gelasio Salazar and Saad Shammas. (Doc. No. 58.) For the following reasons, the Court denies the motion.
BACKGROUND
Factual Background
Plaintiffs bring this purported class action to recover wages allegedly owed to mechanics and “mechanics’ helpers” (collectively “employees”) for work days they did not take a thirty minute meal period. Defendants are companies involved in operating the Avis and Budget car rental agencies.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Lana Guebara, Cross-Appellee v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- David Valles John Breslin, and Members of the General Public Similarly Situated v. Ivy Hill CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norris-Wilson v. Delta-T Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Gonzalez v. Millard Mall Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Valenzuela v. Giumarra Vineyards Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2009