Macy v. Oswald
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
This appeal is the result of an order refusing to open a confessed judgment entered in appellee’s favor against appellants. In such cases the scope of review is limited to an examination of the record to determine whether there has been an abuse of discretion on the part of the lower court. Ahrens v. Goldstein, 376 Pa. 114, 102 A. 2d 164; Associates Discount Corporation v. Kelly, 169 Pa. Superior Ct. 74, 82 A. 2d 689. The judgment resulted from the execution and delivery of a judgment note by appellants to secure the unpaid balance of the purchase price due appellee…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ahrens v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Ross v. McMillanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Gerlock v. GabelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Producers Coke Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Associates Discount Corp. v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bucks County Bank & Trust Co. v. DeGrootSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- MacY v. OSWALD Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Capetola v. OrlandoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- George Stash & Sons v. New Holland Credit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Jolly v. Kent Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.