Legal Opinion
Capetola v. Orlando
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 14, 1978No. Civ. A. 76-1119PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
In this civil suit, plaintiffs are Arthur and Frances Capetola, a married couple, and their daughter, Joan (Dawn) Capetola Robertson. 1 The parents sue individually and as the partnership, Dina Management, in which Arthur and Frances are the sole partners. The complaint seeks injunctive and monetary relief against the well-known entertainer Tony Orlando and two of his associates for the alleged infringement of a trademark.
Presently before me is the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. After considering the able arguments and briefs of counsel, I…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Whitlow v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gilmore v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harold Friedman Inc. v. Thorofare Markets Inc. And Union Real Estate CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Donkin's Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pinkham v. Sara Lee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- D & G Equipment Co., Inc. v. The First National Bank of Greencastle, Pa. v. Georgion, Roger L., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Shumate v. Twin Tier Hospitality, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Look Magazine Enterprises S.A. v. Look, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.