Williams v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KINKEADE, Justice.
Deric Williams appeals his conviction for forgery. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by prior convictions, at twenty-five years’ confinement in the state penitentiary. In one point of error, Williams contends that the trial court erred in failing to suppress his written statement. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The trial court held a hearing to determine the admissibility and voluntariness of Wilhams’s written statement. At the hearing, John L. Jones, a special agent with the United States Secret Service, testified that on February 7, 1992, he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Miniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Cannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Hardesty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Cannon v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Buckley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
- State v. Subke, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
- In re D.J.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Rutherford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.