Rutherford v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice LANG.
Andr’a Decors Rutherford appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. After a jury found appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at thirty-five years’ imprisonment. In a single issue, appellant argues the trial court erred in failing to suppress appellant’s written statement. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
At around 12:30 a.m. on May 29, 1999, two armed men robbed a McDonald’s res taurant in Greenville, Texas. During the robbery, one of the men shot an employee. On the evening of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Rayford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Hardesty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Diamond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- In re D.J.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Jose Isabel Martinez Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Baiza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Edward Leron Satchell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.