Gonzalez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The trial court convicted appellant Jorge Gonzalez for driving while intoxicated. It assessed punishment at 120 days’ confinement, probated for two years, and a $450 fine plus court costs. Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the results of his intoxilyzer breath test. Appellant contends that he was coerced into consenting to the breath test because the Spanish language version of the statutory warning given to him did not constitute a literal, verbatim translation of the English statutory language. Because we find that the Spanish language warning…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Erdman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Frozen Food ExpressSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- State v. SellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- State v. AmayaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- In re D.J.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Miguel Briones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Miguel Briones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Raymond Trent Peterek v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.