Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Bailey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1922No. 22645PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The question presented for determination by this record is whether certain defaulted district paving bonds, issued *718by the city of Red Cloud, a city of the second class, to raise funds to pay for paving in paving districts, are such general obligations of the city as -will warrant the city in taking them up by the issuance of funding bonds payable from funds raised by a general tax.

' It appears that the city, by proper ordinances of the council, had created paying districts designated numbers 2, 3, and 4, and after the paving was completed the city issued its bonds in payment for the work.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. United States v. Fort ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Rialto Irr. Dist. v. StowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Todd v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Bruml v. Village of BrooklynOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Daniels v. City of GeringNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Fairfax Drainage District v. ReimerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Suttor v. Town of WetonkaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API