Legal Opinion

State v. McCambridge

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1974No. 7420SC575PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant has brought and argued in his brief only five exceptions. Other exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned. Rule 28 of the “Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals.”

Three exceptions form the basis of the first assignment of error in which defendant argues the case should have been dismissed because the State’s evidence fails to establish the value of the wire as exceeding $200.00. The manager of the Company gave the following testimony:

“A. There were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. RedmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API