Legal Opinion

Wortham v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1988No. 09-87-059 CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIES, Chief Justice.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance. All evidence in the guilt-innocence phase was presented to a jury on November 13, 1986. Appellant was not present. The jury found her guilty on November 14,1986, when she was present, and the court, on February 25, 1987, assessed her punishment at fifteen years in the Texas Department of Corrections. Appeal has been perfected to this court.

Point of error number one:

“The Trial Court erred in proceeding to trial in the absence of Appellant, in violation of the ‘confrontation clause’ provided for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Crocker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Staten v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
  2. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. SmalisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. SmalisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Tydarrian Tershodd Baul v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API