Commonwealth v. Smalis
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentPapadakos, Justice
I am convinced that the adjournment of the non-jury trial that occurred in this case, which, in turn, resulted in a ten-year break in the continuity of that trial (a substantial period of time by any standard), caused by repeated appeals instigated by the Commonwealth, is the functional equivalent of a mistrial in that it removed the immediacy of the threat to the defendant’s liberty. It is, accordingly, an event that terminated jeopardy. Once jeopardy has ended, further proceedings directed at determining guilt or innocence, even the completion of an interrupted trial, are prohibited.
Jeopardy…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robinson v. NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.