Legal Opinion
Staten v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided December 15, 2010No. 09-09-00490-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
Jamaal Clarence Staten pled “no contest” to possession of marijuana in trial cause number 99797. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Staten guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Staten on community supervision for two years, and assessed a fine of $500. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Staten’s unadjudicated community supervision for violating the conditions of his community supervision. These conditions prohibited Staten from committing other offenses. The State’s motion to revoke alleges that after the court placed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cardona v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Rickels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Cobb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Diamond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Venegas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Barsha Fanner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2013
- Carmina Padroz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
- Dezmon Martin Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.